Uncertainty statements
Record project uncertainty statements and use available AI drafting or feedback as assistance, not as a determination that the statement meets a program's criteria.
Record project uncertainties, activities and effort in an exportable package; whether records meet a particular grant or tax program's requirements depends on that program and qualified review.
Documentation expectations differ by grant, jurisdiction, and program. Some frameworks consider questions such as uncertainty, investigative process, and when records were made, but an activity log cannot establish eligibility or replace advice from a qualified professional. Researchers decide what evidence is relevant and ensure records are accurate.
AIScholar's R&D module can organize selected project actions and user-entered records. Check the activity log and add work done outside the platform; do not assume it is a complete account without review.
Record project uncertainty statements and use available AI drafting or feedback as assistance, not as a determination that the statement meets a program's criteria.
View available logged pipeline actions and add manual entries for work outside the platform. Review coverage and export the records in supported formats.
A floating start/stop timer on every pipeline page, manual time entry, weekly summaries by activity category — investigation & design, experimentation, analysis, support — and CSV timesheet export.
Track notes about learning, evidence, remaining uncertainty, and status. These records help organize project history but do not predict an auditor's assessment.
An inactivity reminder can prompt you to review records; reminders cannot identify every documentation gap.
Export available summaries, uncertainty statements, activity records, knowledge notes, and effort information. Inspect the package for completeness before submitting or sharing.
Enable the optional documentation mode for a project where structured records are useful. Enabling it does not indicate that work qualifies for a particular program.
Record the question or uncertainty and its date as accurately as possible. If you use AI drafting, verify that it reflects the actual project history.
Use available automatic logs, timers, and knowledge notes, then review and supplement them to reflect work and effort accurately.
Review and export the records for discussion with a tax, grant, or institutional advisor. Confirm the recipient's evidence requirements separately.
For an example of how a model-response study can be documented, browse the study walkthroughs. The separate scientific provenance feature is reproducibility — one tracks protocol and trial provenance, the other organizes project activity and effort records.
Design controlled text studies, collect model responses, and explore what changes across conditions. You decide what the evidence means.