Curated citation library
Use available methodological references or add project citations. Check that each source is relevant to the claim it supports.
Organize methods, results and references for expert checking; AI text is a draft, not peer review.
The assistant can organize a draft from recorded project material such as the design, trial records, coding schemes, and analyses. Review that material for completeness and accuracy; generated prose can omit context, misstate a result, or make unsupported interpretations.
Treat generated methods and results as a starting point, not a complete account or a guarantee that a report meets a journal's or institution's requirements.
Use available methodological references or add project citations. Check that each source is relevant to the claim it supports.
Manage detected and manually entered references in the project's citation data and review them before export.
Choose among supported citation formats and inspect the rendered references in your selected export.
Reference lookup can help flag records for checking, but database matches do not guarantee that a source exists as cited or supports the associated claim. Verify sources yourself.
AI-assisted search can suggest candidate literature; independently locate and assess each source before citing it.
Add available analysis charts as exhibits, then check labels, captions, and interpretation against the underlying results.
Draft and edit sections, checking every factual statement, interpretation, and limitation against the study records.
Review detected and custom citations, verify source details and relevance, then inspect the bibliography in the chosen style.
Export in supported formats, then review the result and adapt it to your collaborators' and venue's requirements.
For context, see study walkthroughs and review the reproducibility and export guidance.
Design controlled text studies, collect model responses, and explore what changes across conditions. You decide what the evidence means.